Track BlueDoc and GreenDoc document templates
This commit is contained in:
Vendored
+56
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
# [Project Name]: Design One-Pager (GreenDoc)
|
||||
|
||||
**Author(s):** [Name]
|
||||
**Status:** [Draft / Approved / Shipped]
|
||||
**Last Updated:** YYYY-MM-DD
|
||||
**Estimated Effort:** [e.g., 2 weeks, 1 sprint]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Summary
|
||||
A 2–3 sentence overview of the change. What are you doing and why?
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Problem Statement
|
||||
Describe the specific pain point or "broken" state this project addresses.
|
||||
* *Example: Currently, users cannot filter their search history by date, leading to high latency in manual lookup.*
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Proposed Solution
|
||||
Explain the high-level logic of the fix or feature.
|
||||
* What is the specific code change or configuration update?
|
||||
* How does it interact with existing systems?
|
||||
* *Note: Use a single simple diagram if the logic is non-trivial.*
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Risks & Trade-offs
|
||||
Even small changes have risks. Address them upfront.
|
||||
* **Performance:** Will this increase memory usage?
|
||||
* **Complexity:** Does this add a new dependency?
|
||||
* **Backwards Compatibility:** Will this break existing clients?
|
||||
* **Alternatives:** Why did you choose this over a "quicker" or "better" fix?
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Success Criteria (Metrics)
|
||||
How will you know this worked?
|
||||
* [ ] Primary metric (e.g., "Feature usage > 5%")
|
||||
* [ ] Guardrail metric (e.g., "Latency does not increase by > 10ms")
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Implementation & Rollout
|
||||
A brief bulleted list of the steps to ship.
|
||||
1. Feature flag implementation.
|
||||
2. Canary to 1% of users.
|
||||
3. Full rollout.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Comparison: BlueDoc vs. GreenDoc
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | BlueDoc (Standard) | GreenDoc (One-Pager) |
|
||||
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
||||
| **Scope** | Major systems, new services. | Small features, optimizations, bug fixes. |
|
||||
| **Length** | 5–20+ pages. | 1–2 pages. |
|
||||
| **Review** | Cross-functional committees (SRE, Security). | Peer-level or Team Lead review. |
|
||||
| **Focus** | Long-term scalability and architecture. | Immediate impact and implementation. |
|
||||
|
||||
### Markdown Tips for GreenDocs:
|
||||
* **Be Brutally Concise:** If a section requires more than three paragraphs, consider upgrading to a **BlueDoc**.
|
||||
* **Checklists:** Use `[ ]` to show remaining work or requirements.
|
||||
* **Inline Links:** Link directly to the relevant code files or bug tracker (Jira/Buganizer) to keep the doc self-contained.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user