Files
MusicFS/docs/templates/bluedoc.md
T
2026-05-13 12:39:16 +02:00

97 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# [Project Name]: Design Doc
**Authors:** [Author Name(s)]
**Status:** [Draft / In-Review / Approved / Obsolete]
**Last Updated:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Reviewers:** [List of reviewers, usually @usernames]
**Approvers:** [List of final decision makers]
**Document Link:** [Link to this file or rendered version]
---
## 1. Abstract
A high-level summary (13 paragraphs) of what the project is, what problem it solves, and the proposed solution. This should be readable by a non-expert.
## 2. Background
Context for why this project exists.
- What is the current state?
- What are the pain points?
- Are there existing systems that this will replace or interact with?
- Include links to relevant PRDs (Product Requirement Documents) or previous design docs.
## 3. Goals & Non-Goals
Clarity on scope is critical to prevent scope creep.
### 3.1. Goals
* **Primary Goal:** The most important outcome.
* Metric-driven goals (e.g., "Reduce latency by 20%").
* Functional requirements (e.g., "Allow users to edit comments").
### 3.2. Non-Goals
* Features that might seem related but are explicitly out of scope.
* Future improvements that are deferred.
## 4. Proposed Design
The "meat" of the document. Start with the high-level architecture and zoom in.
### 4.1. High-Level Architecture
Provide a high-level diagram or description of how the system fits together.
> *Tip: Use Mermaid.js or link to an embedded image.*
### 4.2. Detailed Design
Go into specific components, APIs, and data models.
* **API Definitions:** Describe new endpoints, Protobuf definitions, or CLI commands.
* **Data Schema:** Database tables, key-value structures, or file formats.
* **Workflows:** Step-by-step logic for complex operations (e.g., auth flow).
## 5. Cross-Cutting Concerns
Google design docs place heavy emphasis on these "standard" reviews.
### 5.1. Security & Privacy
- How is data encrypted?
- What are the access control lists (ACLs)?
- Does this handle PII (Personally Identifiable Information)?
### 5.2. Observability (Monitoring & Logging)
- What metrics will be exported (e.g., RPC error rates, latency)?
- What logging is required for debugging?
- What are the "Golden Signals" for the dashboard?
### 5.3. Scalability & Performance
- What are the expected QPS (Queries Per Second)?
- How does the system scale (Horizontal vs. Vertical)?
- What are the resource requirements (CPU, RAM, Storage)?
### 5.4. Testing Plan
- Unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests.
- Strategy for load testing or "chaos" testing.
## 6. Alternatives Considered
*A BlueDoc is not just about the chosen path, but why others were rejected.*
* **Alternative A:** Briefly describe it and why it was rejected (e.g., "Too complex," "High latency").
* **Alternative B:** Why "Doing Nothing" is not an option.
## 7. Implementation Plan
- **Phase 1:** Minimum Viable Product (MVP).
- **Phase 2:** Feature parity or migrations.
- **Rollout/Rollback:** How will the feature be toggled? (e.g., feature flags).
## 8. Glossary / References
- Links to external libraries.
- Definitions for project-specific acronyms.
---
### Markdown Style Tips (Google Conventions):
1. **Line Length:** Google's internal style guide suggests a soft limit of **80 characters** per line for source Markdown to make it easier to review in code-diff tools.
2. **Headings:** Use `#` for title, `##` for sections, and `###` for subsections.
3. **TOC:** If your environment supports it, use `[TOC]` at the top to generate a Table of Contents.
4. **Diagrams:** Use **Mermaid** blocks if using GitHub/GitLab, otherwise link to a stable SVG/PNG.
```mermaid
graph TD;
A-->B;
A-->C;
B-->D;
C-->D;
```